We live in a time where there is extreme fascination with things found in the book of the Revelation (though this has really always been the case). You know…that book at the end of your Bible with all of those psychedelic visions of creatures doing bizarre things, angels trumpeting or pouring out destruction on the earth. This is a book that has held the attention of generations, but as many have bought into the notion that the Mayan’s were onto something about the end of the world in 2012, the thirst for seeking out such concerns has only grown.
What is the point of this last book of the Bible anyways? Does it reveal who the Antichrist is? Is it to guarantee we don’t receive some micro-chip implantation as the “mark of the beast”? Or perhaps to give us a timeline to Armageddon? All of these things have been proposed ad nauseum with charts, graphs and research to demonstrate the authority of their interpretation of the meaning of the Revelation. But is this really the point?
The answer is simple: No! The point of the Revelation is to reveal the Lord Jesus Christ. In fact the actual name of this final book is not “Revelations” (as if to be about revelations of all sorts of things), but “The Revelation”. The fuller name is even “The Revelation of Jesus Christ”. This book is about the one who knows and holds his own and will both reward and punish according to their faithfulness to him (Rev.2-3).
This book is about God’s final justice demonstrated in the reaction of the world to the revelation of Jesus. This world will not bend the knee to Jesus willfully, but reject him to the last (though multitudes from every people group will indeed place their trust and obedience in him). This world will offer its own “christ” and its own kingdom, but at the last these will all be destroyed. It is, in the end, about the glory of Jesus the Christ as sovereign over every power and authority, including death and the grave. And about those who overcome all opposition to faithfully give testimony to Jesus as Lord and Savior. He is the one who gives life (and is life) and he is the light of the world. He is the only one worthy of praise and glory and honor. And he is coming soon. Even so…come quickly Lord Jesus!
[This was an article I had published in the North Star News - Thursday, August 23, 2012]
Friday, August 24, 2012
Sunday, August 12, 2012
Pentecost In North West Minnesota
Wednesday, August 08, 2012
Seattle Here I Come
I received word today that my paper proposal has been accepted for the annual Society for Pentecostal Studies meeting in Seattle in March 21-23, 2013 hosted by Seattle Pacific University. I truly enjoy these meetings -- the papers, the discussions, the friendships.
If anyone is interested, my paper is titled "Emerging Homiletics: A Pentecostal Response." In this paper, I interact primarily with the homiletical proposals of Doug Pagitt (pastor of Solomon's Porch in Minneapolis, MN) who is a leading voice in the Emergent Church and has written Preaching Re-Imagined: The Role of the Sermon in Communities of Faith (Zondervan 2005). From my perspective, I appropriate what I believe is right about Pagitt's approach and lay out how I believe Pentecostal preaching actually engages the criticisms he raises against "speaching" (Pagitt's term for contemporary models of preaching).
So, I'm looking forward to another eventful time at SPS this coming year!
If anyone is interested, my paper is titled "Emerging Homiletics: A Pentecostal Response." In this paper, I interact primarily with the homiletical proposals of Doug Pagitt (pastor of Solomon's Porch in Minneapolis, MN) who is a leading voice in the Emergent Church and has written Preaching Re-Imagined: The Role of the Sermon in Communities of Faith (Zondervan 2005). From my perspective, I appropriate what I believe is right about Pagitt's approach and lay out how I believe Pentecostal preaching actually engages the criticisms he raises against "speaching" (Pagitt's term for contemporary models of preaching).
So, I'm looking forward to another eventful time at SPS this coming year!
Thursday, August 02, 2012
Ezekiel and The Message
Eugene Peterson's The Message offers a fresh reading of Scripture that is intended not for study, but for hearing Scripture in a way intended to be comparable to those originally hearing it.* In many ways he has done a marvelous job of this. He is a remarkable scholar and author (one of my favorites) and I am often delighted by his perspective on things.
However, recently I received a newsletter that quoted from Ezekiel and I was struck by the alteration to the Hebrew text. The most recurring statement...indeed THE theme of Ezekiel...is the revelation of YHWH as YHWH (Israel's God). This is signified in every translation I've seen (with the strangely lacking use ANYWHERE in the Amplified version) and well conveys the intent of the message to and through Ezekiel for Israel (Judah) and the nations.
The Message, instead, states that they (Israel, nations) will "know that I am God." While the referent is still the God of Israel whose intent is to reveal that indeed He is God...this falls short of conveying the original hearing which emphasized the Name (with all its connections to the revelation and covenant with Abraham and Israel at Sinai). I was sorely disappointed by this reading, because it seems to me to diminish the very center of Ezekiel's theology.
* It was NOT intended for preaching or study, which sadly it has been used for by far too many a preacher. It is important we understand original intent...including that of a translation.
However, recently I received a newsletter that quoted from Ezekiel and I was struck by the alteration to the Hebrew text. The most recurring statement...indeed THE theme of Ezekiel...is the revelation of YHWH as YHWH (Israel's God). This is signified in every translation I've seen (with the strangely lacking use ANYWHERE in the Amplified version) and well conveys the intent of the message to and through Ezekiel for Israel (Judah) and the nations.
The Message, instead, states that they (Israel, nations) will "know that I am God." While the referent is still the God of Israel whose intent is to reveal that indeed He is God...this falls short of conveying the original hearing which emphasized the Name (with all its connections to the revelation and covenant with Abraham and Israel at Sinai). I was sorely disappointed by this reading, because it seems to me to diminish the very center of Ezekiel's theology.
* It was NOT intended for preaching or study, which sadly it has been used for by far too many a preacher. It is important we understand original intent...including that of a translation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)